Twenty years of public decisions inform today’s debates. These studies trace choices about wages, housing, social protection, energy and public services, examine their consequences and identify the questions they leave open.
The financial crisis tested public enterprise governance, the allocation of responsibilities and social protection funding. These studies examine solidarity, economic stabilisation and the public responsibilities exposed by that period.
Unemployment insurance, pensions, energy and spatial planning raised connected but distinct questions. This period shows how reform changes the distribution of risk, access to services and the scope for investment.
Debates over wages, health insurance and pensions intersected with decisions on rail, taxation and energy. The studies distinguish proposals, voting outcomes and implementation, testing claims against the effects that can actually be established.
Media, social funding, corporate responsibility and the pandemic revealed the connection between rights and practical provision. This period examines the instruments and limitations of employment protection, care, housing and digital infrastructure.
Energy shocks, health premiums, pension decisions and banking risks brought the distribution of costs to the fore. These studies connect decisions with disposable incomes, public service resources and investment.
The first common federal governance framework distinguished separating the delivery of a task from abandoning the task itself. Public services depend on that distinction.
The fifth disability-insurance revision strengthened early intervention. Its social test is work people can actually sustain, beyond fewer new pensions.
Short-time work shares the cost of a temporary decline. Its value depends on lasting job preservation compared with what would have happened without support.
Retirement age, conversion rates, an AHV supplement and VAT formed a linked package. Rejection blocked implementation and cannot be reduced to a single motive.
Abolishing special statuses was combined with new reliefs and federal transfers. The rejected package requires its choices and recipients to be distinguished.
The Federal Supreme Court upheld Neuchâtel’s social-policy measure. Implementation required clarity on the statutory base, indexation, paid hours and collective agreements.
The rejected initiative separated money creation from bank lending. Its stability promise requires examination by function, with proposals distinguished from experience.