PCP

Policy research method

A useful policy study starts with a problem that can be described precisely. It identifies the people affected, the institutions responsible and the outcome sought. Broad judgments must lead to questions that evidence can help answer: which service is missing, which investment is delayed, what cost falls on households and which decision could change it?

Policy research methodHTML · English
Download

Establish the evidence

Use original statistics, official documents and clearly identified research. Record the period measured, the publication date, definitions and any limits to comparison. An average may conceal different circumstances. A stated objective is not a measured result. Where evidence is incomplete, the proposal should explain the uncertainty and the information needed to resolve it.

Study the Chinese mechanism

Describe the relevant Chinese policy in its actual institutional setting. Identify the organisation, finance, technical capabilities and conditions that help explain its results. Compare several sources where a causal claim is important. The purpose is to understand how an advantage is produced and which aspects are relevant to a Swiss problem.

Develop the Swiss proposal

Name the authority able to act, the existing institution involved and the proposed change. Set out resources, staffing, financing and the relationship to other policies. Consider the costs of transition and maintenance. Explain why the proposal fits the identified problem and what practical alternatives were considered.

Review results and revise

Choose a small set of indicators linked to the objective. Establish a baseline and a reasonable period for assessment. Include experience from service users and workers. Publish the reasoning behind revisions. A contribution is useful when it identifies a source, a weakness, an alternative measure or an implementation condition that the current text has missed.

Sources and further reading

Continue reading