Work and wagesNews

Sunday work: protect shared rest as a social guarantee

On 12 and 13 October, the Council of States economic affairs committee maintained its proposal to permit up to twelve working Sundays a year in retail. The Council of States is due to consider the proposal again in its winter 2026 session. The PCP opposes the normalisation of Sunday work and defends rest that people can actually share.

Reference date
Published

A proposal, not a new rule already in force

The committee’s statement describes its intended next steps on Zurich cantonal initiative 23.325. It does not immediately authorise twelve opening Sundays or amend employment contracts already in force. That distinction matters to employees and businesses alike.

SECO’s guidance explains the general rules on Sunday work, exceptions and compensatory rest. Their application depends on the circumstances. Temporary and regular Sunday work must not be treated as identical, particularly when discussing compensation.

Include living time in the assessment

Greater freedom to shop does not identify who must work to provide it. For retail staff, additional Sundays can affect childcare, travel and time spent with family and friends. Those consequences do not disappear simply because each canton could choose whether to use the expanded permission.

A weekday off can be valuable. It does not always offer the same opportunities as a day when other people are also available. Shared rest therefore has a collective value. It concerns the organisation of social life and the distribution of power over working time.

Test the commercial promises

Longer opening hours do not, by themselves, demonstrate higher overall demand. Assessment must distinguish purchases shifted between days from genuinely additional activity, then account for staffing, security and transport costs. Small shops and large chains do not have equal means to absorb those costs.

The PCP calls for published assumptions and scrutiny of actual employment conditions: contracts, notice of schedules, premiums, recovery time, health and pressure to accept shifts. A consultation that considered only customer footfall would leave the central social questions unanswered.

The PCP’s priority

Sunday rest must remain the rule. Employees must not become the adjustment mechanism in a permanent competition over commercial opening hours. Where Sunday work is necessary, predictable schedules, compensation and staff participation must be secured.

Labour inspectorates need resources to verify practice. The costs of opening must not be quietly transferred to families, public services or unpaid care work. Political judgment should turn on the working and living conditions achieved, rather than commercial availability alone.

Documents and sources

The cited documents provide the facts and provisions examined. Political judgments and proposals expressed in this article are those of the PCP.