Analysis

Making housing affordability last

An affordable home must remain affordable after it is built or renovated. Public land, non-profit provision and the conditions attached to public support should be considered alongside transport, everyday services and the ability of residents to remain in their homes.

The Entlisberg cooperative housing estate in Zurich-Wollishofen.Photo credits

The question in Switzerland — Housing that remains affordable

Housing policy must address the supply, location, quality and lasting affordability of homes. Increasing the number of dwellings does not alone establish who can afford them or for how long. Public land, transport connections and the terms attached to public support influence the outcome. Housing should be considered alongside the services that make an area liveable.

The Chinese experience — Housing that remains affordable

China offers experience in planning housing alongside urban infrastructure, public facilities and development objectives. The Party studies the organisation of supply and the relationship between land, construction and services. Specific models must be examined on their own terms, including financing and residents’ costs; scale alone does not explain suitability.

Application within Swiss institutions — Housing that remains affordable

Swiss communes and cantons already have planning responsibilities and different housing instruments. The PCP proposes combining these with cooperative and non-profit provision, long-term land arrangements and coordinated transport investment. The relevant measures vary with the local housing market and must state the responsibilities of each authority.

Proposed measures — Housing that remains affordable

  • Use public land for homes with lasting affordability commitments.
  • Support cooperatives and other non-profit housing providers.
  • Coordinate housing with public transport and everyday services.
  • Publish the affordability conditions attached to public support.
  • Plan renovation with tenant protection and transparent costs.
  • Evaluate housing supply by access and long-term occupancy costs.

Resources and implementation — Housing that remains affordable

Projects should present land costs, construction, finance, maintenance and expected rents separately. Public support needs a defined duration and enforceable terms. Evaluation should consider delivery times and whether the intended households can actually access the homes. The effects of renovation on rent and displacement must be examined before work is agreed.

Assessment of results — Housing that remains affordable

  • Homes delivered under lasting affordability conditions.
  • Rent and occupancy costs in relation to income.
  • Waiting times and access to supported housing.
  • Continuity of residence after renovation.

Questions for research

Use original statistics, official documents and clearly identified research. Record the period measured, the publication date, definitions and any limits to comparison. An average may conceal different circumstances. A stated objective is not a measured result. Where evidence is incomplete, the proposal should explain the uncertainty and the information needed to resolve it.

Sources and further reading

Continue reading